GRE Issue Topic 60

GRE Issue Topic 60

Topic:

Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

رهبران با تقاضا هایی که از آنها می شود، خلق می شوند.

پاسخی بنویسید که در آن درمورد موافقت یا مخالفت با این جمله بحث کنید و استدلال خود را درباره موضع گیری خود توضیح دهید. در توسعه و حمایت از موضع خود، باید روشهایی را در نظر بگیرید که طبق آن، این نظریه ممکن است درست باشد یا نباشد و توضیح دهید که این ملاحظات چگونه موضع شما را شکل می دهند.

موافق

  • وظیفه رهبران یک جامعه هرچقد کوچک یا بزرگ، این است که طبق شرایط و مشکلات روز جامعه و درخواست هایی که اعضای آن جامعه از او دارند، رهبری را پیش ببرند. به ‌عنوان مثال زمانی که داعش به وجود آمد، رهبران تمام جوامع مجبور شدند، تصمیماتی را برای از بین بردن این گروهک سیاسی بگیرند، چون جان مردمشان را تهدید می‌کرد و مردم از رهبران تقاضا داشتند که امنیت آنها را تامین کند.
  • رهبران بزرگ برای حل مشکلاتی که برای گروهی از جامعه وجود داشته به پا خواستند تا دولت را مجبور کنند که به تقاضای آنها رسیدگی کند. مثلا، آبراهام لینکلن (Abraham Lincoln) برای مبارزه با برده داری که تقاضی سیاه پوستان جامعه بود به پا خواست.

مخالف

  • رهبران موفق معمولاً توسط افراد قدرتمند حمایت می شوند. بنابراین، برای اینکه بتوانند این افراد را حامی خود نگه دارند، درخواستهای آنها را مد نظر می گیرند. مثال های زیادی در تاریخ وجود دارد که رهبران فقط به نفع قشر خاصی که از آنها حمایت می‌کردند، کارهایی را انجام می دادند و تقاضای عموم مردم را نادیده می گرفتند.
  • گاهی اوقات رهبران در شرایط خاصی مانند تهدید شدن یا تحت فشار قرار گرفتن قرار می‌گیرند که مجبور می‌شوند از یک فرد یا یک حزب خاص تبعیت کنند و درخواست های آنها را در نظر بگیرند تا به خود و خانواده شان آسیبی نرسد. به عنوان مثال، زمانی که یک هواپیما ربایی اتفاق می‌افتد، خلبان هواپیما به عنوان رهبر آن مجبور است از تقاضای افرادی که جان مسافرین را تهدید می‌کنند، پیروی کند.
  • رهبران موفق و افرادی که نامشان در تاریخ به عنوان یک رهبر پیشرو جاودانه شده، ویژگی ها و خصوصیات اخلاقی منحصر به فردی داشتند که در کمتر کسی یافت می شود. در حقیقت می‌توان گفت که آنها رهبر به دنیا آمده بودند. بنابراین، اعمالی که برای رسیدن به هدف شان انجام می دادند به تقاضایی که جامعه یا طرفدارانشان از آنها داشت، ربطی نداشت بلکه آنها ایده‌آل هایی در ذهن خود داشتند که برای رسیدن به آن تلاش کردند و در این میان برای این که قدرت کافی برای مقابله با مخالفین خود را داشته باشند، افرادی را به عنوان طرفدار دور خود جمع کردند.
  • رهبران موفق افرادی هستند که می توانند ایده ها و نظریات خودشان را به وضوح برای سایرین توضیح داده و آنها را متقاعد کنند که از آنها پیروی کنند نه اینکه صرفا به خواسته مردم تن بدهند.
  • رهبران معمولاً از مسائلی آگاه هستند که شاید عموم مردم نسبت به آن آگاهی نداشته باشند اما زمانی که این افراد آگاهی خود را با سایرین به اشتراک می‌گذارند، مردم میشه همراه آنها شده و از آنها طرفداری می کنند.

 

Strategies
Restate the Issue:
This statement tells how leader are created. How they are not created?
In other words:
Leaders do not arise until demands have been placed on them.
Determine what question is being answered by the issue statement.
How are leaders created?
Or: Under what conditions do leaders emerge?
How would you answer the questions? Your answer will help you develop your response to the statement.
Now think about the parts of the statement that provide evidence that you can affirm or refute.
a) created – This assumes that leaders are made and not born. There must be some process by which leaders come to be.
b) demands – These are like orders. One cannot avoid or ignore a demand.
c) placed upon them – This implies a lack of choice.

Opposing viewpoint:
Leaders arise through some preparation to lead.
Identify the parts of the opposing statement that provide evidence that you can refute or affirm.
a) Arise – This implies that those that are prone to leadership will assume it when the situation requires.
b) preparation – Leaders don’t appear spontaneously. Through some desire or proclivity for leadership, they have prepared to assume it when called upon.
Is there another way to look at this issue? Are some leaders reluctant to lead? Are they leading by default? Did they assume a leadership role out of a sense of responsibility rather than the desire to lead? Do some seek leadership? Can the two stated viewpoints be combined?

New viewpoint:
Some leaders are forced into that position by circumstances, while others develop leadership skills over a lifetime.
Identify the parts of the new viewpoint that provide evidence for you to refute or affirm.
a) Some – This leaves room for exceptions. It is not all.
b) forced – This suggests a lack of willingness to lead. There may be no options.
c) circumstances – This is the same as a situation. The implication is the situation is unexpected.
d) develop – Development implies growth. Some leaders have grown into more sophisticated leadership abilities.
e) lifetime – Real leadership isn’t something that happens overnight. As situations change, leaders learn to adapt.

Position:
Some leaders are forced into that position by circumstances, while others develop leadership skills over a lifetime.
Examples and Reasons:
a) The lost battalion – Major Whittlesey’s sudden elevation to military leadership
b) Flight 93 – Regular citizens taking over in a crisis.
c) Military generals – They are career leaders.

Sample 1:

Leadership positions are best filled by people whose nature enables them to endure both the successes and failures that accompany the challenges a leader will face. Some leaders are made by their circumstances, which push them to acquire traits that they may not have otherwise. This leadership can be transient – that is, leaders can be made by a particular situation and then return to their non–leadership position once the situation has been handled. History contains many examples of all such leaders.

When the United States entered WWI, Charles Whittlesey, a mild–mannered, Harvard–educated lawyer was commissioned an officer in the US Army. He led a battalion of young infantrymen out of the trenches and into the Argonne Forest in France in an attempt to retake land that was occupied by the Germans. Having been given incorrect information, Major Whittlesey and his men became trapped behind enemy lines where they endured artillery attacks by the Germans who outnumbered them. They even came under friendly fire when the Allies used incorrect coordinates in an effort to attack the Germans with cannon fire. After 5 days, the battalion was rescued. Of the more than 500 men who entered the forest with Whittlesey, fewer than 200 walked out of the forest with him. The remainder had been killed, captured by the enemy, or wounded. After the war ended, Whittlesey, who received the Congressional Medal of Honor for his heroic deeds, returned to the practice of law. Three years later, Charles Whittlesey booked a cruise, and while on that cruise, jumped overboard. Major Whittlesey became a leader through the demands placed upon him. Even though he acted with honor and effectively saved the lives of hundreds of the men in his charge, the loss of so many more weighed so heavily on him that he took his own life.

Renowned leaders have arisen from the ranks of the US armed forces. American history texts recount the exploits of brave men like General Douglas McArthur who promised the people of the Philippines that he would return. General Dwight Eisenhower was the supreme Allied Commander during the invasion of Normandy on D–Day in 1944 and went on to serve two terms as President of the United States. The difference between these men and Charles Whittlesey was their choice of a military career. They embraced the challenges, celebrated the victories, and accepted the loss of life.

On rare occasions, situations do arise that force ordinary citizens to assume leadership and perform extraordinary acts of bravery. Ten years ago, passengers on United Airlines flight 93, after learning what had happened at the World Trade Center in New York City, decided to take action that would prevent their own hijacked plane from causing a similar disaster and stormed the cockpit where terrorists had assumed control of the plane. As a result, the plane that was on a course that would have taken it to the nation's capital, crashed in a field in Pennsylvania, averting disaster while killing everyone on board.

While events occasionally conspire to force individuals into leadership roles, effective, long–term leadership is best left to those whose proclivities cause them to desire the responsibilities of leadership. Reluctant or ineffectual leaders may cause more harm than good, either to themselves or those they are leading.

 

Sample 2:

Who is a leader? A leader is a person who is followed by others due to his charisma and his ability to lead people in the right direction. A leader must exude qualities like confidence, integrity, dedication, honesty and competence in carrying out the tasks related to leadership. A leader has to cater to the demands of the people who are led by him. However, the contention that the demands of people can create a leader is not justified as not everyone can inculcate the qualities that are required of a leader. A person can be elected as a leader by his people but he will not be able to succeed in becoming an effective leader unless he has the inborn traits of leadership. Hence, it is true that leaders cater to the demands of the people who are led by them, but leaders can never be created by these demands alone.

A leader’s prime responsibility is to provide a solution for the development of the people who follow him. Take the example of political leaders. These leaders are elected by the general population. During the election process, political leaders are pitted against each other and the one who is able to garner the highest number of votes wins the election. What do these leaders have to do for winning elections? They have to consistently prove to the populace that they will cater to their demands and provide them with facilities that they are in need of. The leader who is ultimately voted into power is expected to carry out his promises. A leader who is able to meet the promises made by him during the campaigning process will probably be elected into power for the second term as well. His competence in carrying out the promises made by him cannot be developed overnight. People may have elected a person and placed demands on him, but he cannot win the confidence of his people and be respected as a leader unless he demonstrates leadership qualities.

The demands that are placed upon a person are a big challenge for him to become a leader. In a business enterprise, a manager is expected to lead the people working under him in such a way that the productivity of the company increases and the company reaps high profits. Good qualifications and experience may have assisted in placing the manager in this position. However, he will need leadership skills in addition to his capabilities in order to meet the demands placed upon him if he has to succeed as an effective leader. Inability of the manager to handle the people under him in the most cost-effective manner may lead to a scenario wherein he is replaced by a more competent manager. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary for a person to prove his competence after being nominated as a leader because merely placing demands is not sufficient for creating leaders.

One can look up history to find examples of numerous leaders who rose to lead their people because there were demands placed upon them. Mahatma Gandhi led the people of India to independence, but could the people of India have created a Mahatma Gandhi out of any other person by placing demands on him? It was the qualities, ideology and principles of Mahatma Gandhi which were revered by the people who followed him. The freedom struggle of India placed crucial demands on all its leaders, however only a few of them were actually able to lead the people successfully. Therefore, effective leaders can be created by external demands placed on them along with the support of the inherent leadership qualities that are required to be present in the person who is nominated as a leader.


نظرات کاربران

هنوز نظری درج نشده است!