GRE Issue Topic 132

GRE Issue Topic 132

Topic:

Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.

Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

ادعا: تصمیمات عمده سیاست را باید همیشه به سیاستمداران و سایر کارشناسان دولت سپرد.

دلیل: سیاستمداران و سایر کارشناسان دولت از آگاهی بیشتری برخوردارند و بنابراین قضاوت و دیدگاه بهتری نسبت به عموم مردم دارند.

پاسخی بنویسید که در آن درباره اینکه تا چه میزان  با  این ادعا و دلیلی که ادعا بر مبنای آن پایه گذاری شده است، موافق یا مخالف هستید، بحث کنید.

  • در قانون اساسی هر کشور، سلسله‌مراتبی برای انتخاب افرادی که قرار است تصمیمات مهمی را برای جامعه بگیرند، تعیین شده است. در کشورهای دموکرات و جمهوری با برگزاری انتخابات، نمایندگان مردم انتخاب می شوند تا در مسائل مهم به جای آنها تصمیم بگیرند. این افراد معمولاً در چهارچوب قانون دارای خصایص و ویژگی‌های قابل توجهی هستند تا در زمینه های مختلف برای تصمیم گیری صلاحیت داشته باشد.
  • تاریخ نشان داده است که وقتی فقط یک فرد یا چند نفر، مسئول تصویب قوانین سیاسی و تصمیم‌گیری‌های مهم در یک کشور می‌شوند، تبعیض و ظلم افزایش پیدا می‌کند. به عنوان مثال، در گذشته زمانی که حق قانونگذاری آمریکا به سفیدپوستان داده شد، آنها سیاه پوستان را از تمامی حقوق اجتماعی شان سلب کردند. سیاه پوستان حتی نمی توانستند برای غذا خوردن به رستوران بروند. بنابراین، بهتر است تصمیم‌گیری‌های سیاسی توسط نمایندگان مختلفی از تمامی اقشار جامعه که توسط خود مردم انتخاب شده اند، انجام گیرد.
  • اگر فقط گروه خاصی به مدت طولانی مسئول تصویب قوانین و تصمیم‌گیری‌های سیاسی یک کشور باشند، نظرات شخصی آنها در این تصمیم گیری ها وارد می شود. همچنین آنها ممکن است در تمام زمینه ها و جنبه ها، تخصص لازم و کافی را نداشته باشند و یا نتوانند از این ایده های جدید برای بهبود اصلاح وضعیت جامعه استفاده کنند. بنابراین، بهتر است سیاستمداران هرچند سال یکبار عوض شوند تا افرادی با تخصص های مختلف بتوانند به بهبود وضعیت جامعه در زمینه ای که متخصص دارند، کمک کنند.
  • سیاستمداران و افراد متخصص و کارشناس نسبت به عموم مردم دید بهتری نسبت به مسائل مختلف دارند و می توانند راه حل های بهتری برای حل مشکلات و یا بهبود وضعیت در آن زمینه مطرح کنند. با این وجود نباید خواست عمومی مردم نیز نادیده گرفته شود. به همین علت است که معمولاً سیاستمداران دارای تخصص های مختلف به عنوان نمایندگان اقشار مختلف مردم در محلی مانند مجلس گرد هم جمع می شوند تا تصمیم گیریهای جمعی داشته باشند که نظر همه مردم نیز در آن دخیل باشد.
  • اگر سیاستمداران قرار است در یک زمینه تخصصی به عنوان مثال احداث پل یا احداث سد در یک محل تصمیم‌گیری کنند و خودشان در این زمینه تخصص کافی ندارند، حتماً باید از افراد متخصص در این کار مشورت بگیرند تا تمام جنبه های مثبت و منفی آن بررسی شده و تصمیم درستی گرفته شود. به هر حال برای هر تصمیمی، بخشی از بودجه دولت اختصاص داده می‌شود که حق تمام مردم است. برای اینکه از این حق به درستی استفاده شود باید متخصصین و کارشناسان منتخب مردم در زمینه های مختلف نظرات خود را بیان کرده و در نهایت به یک توافقی که به صلاح ملت است، برسند.

 

 

Strategies
Combine the claim and the reason into one statement using a subordinate clause.
In other words:
Because politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public, they alone should make major policy decisions.
What are the assumptions stated or implied in the claim and reason? These will provide evidence that you can refute or affirm in your argument.
a) Major policy decisions occur only at the government level.
b) People other than politicians and government experts are not well informed enough to make major policy decisions.
c) No groups other than government experts or the general public are likely to make policy decisions.

Opposing viewpoint:
Claim: Major policy decisions should not always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are no better informed or have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
What are the assumptions stated or implied in the claim and reason? These will provide evidence that you can refute or affirm in your argument.
a) People other than politicians and government experts are capable of making major policy decisions.

Sample 1:

Major policy decisions guide the actions of people in virtually all walks of life. The Federal Reserve determines policy regarding interest rates that banks charge their biggest customers and, consequently, the interest rates that the average consumer pays for mortgages and auto loans. Although the Fed chairman is appointed by the President, he or she must have autonomy to make monetary decisions independently of politicians. Certainly, the average citizen lacks the specific knowledge necessary to create fiscal policy for the entire country. However, many policies that guide the lives of Americans today would not exist were it not for activism on the parts of ordinary citizens. When policy decisions affect the basic rights of humans, the contributions of the general public cannot be overlooked.

Politicians do not always display better judgment than the general public when they make or uphold policy. For generations, states in the South enforced laws arising from the policy of segregation. Black Americans were banned from eating in white restaurants, using white restrooms, or attending white schools. In 1892, Homer Plessy, in an act that foreshadowed Rosa Parks' behavior on a Montgomery bus in 1951, sat in a designated "white" car of the East Louisiana Railroad. After Plessy identified himself as a black man, authorities arrested him. Plessy's case went all the way to the Supreme Court, where, in 1896, all but one justice declared that the policy of separate but equal facilities for white and black people was acceptable and did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. The facilities for black people never reached the equal level of those for white people. Their schools were inferior; the buildings were run down, and the books were discarded by white schools. For decades, black children were banned from riding school buses and, often, had to walk long distances to attend schools designated for them. Nearly half a decade after the Plessy case, the NAACP sponsored a case in Topeka, Kansas, that represented several parents who wanted their children to be allowed to attend schools in their neighborhoods rather than the “separate but equal" schools. In a unanimous decision in 1954, the Supreme Court in Brown v the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, ruled that the separate but equal policy was unconstitutional, thereby integrating public schools through out the country. Left to their own devices, politicians and other government experts would have continued to allow de facto segregation in the United States. Without the impetus from those suffering under the policy, little change would have occurred or would have come much later.

When a policy has been in effect for a long time, it becomes difficult to change. Even though the Supreme Court decision of 1954 prohibited segregation, people in the South were reluctant to grant civil rights to their black neighbors. They held onto their belief in the superiority of the white man, a remnant of the days of slavery on southern plantations. Their leaders devised requirements for voting that made it virtually impossible for black men and women to exercise their right of suffrage. When any group of citizens cannot vote to change policy or elect legislators who represent their interests, repressive laws and regulations persist. Without the efforts of the NAACP, the Freedom Riders, student activists from northern universities and the leadership of Martin Luther King, Jr., President Lyndon B. Johnson may not have been convinced to sign into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

One should not assume that politicians and government experts are better informed than the general public and, therefore, the only ones capable of making or changing major policy decisions. Senators, representative, and the president all select advisers from the general public. They look for the best and brightest in a variety of fields to fill positions in their offices and the cabinet. The expertise they gained while plying their trades in the public sector makes them valuable assets at the national level. Although average citizens do not have the power to create policy, their voices contribute to the choices those politicians and government experts make to change the manner in which the business of everyday life is carried out.


نظرات کاربران

هنوز نظری درج نشده است!